5/n Later estimates that also used data from China came to similar conclusions - an IFR of 0.66% in this paperpic.twitter.com/J70ZG84Nu2
You can add location information to your Tweets, such as your city or precise location, from the web and via third-party applications. You always have the option to delete your Tweet location history. Learn more
Did you see the seroprevalence study from Germany? Had a weird number that I wasn't sure if was the IFR or something different, but was in a similar ballpark
Is it true that the IFR for in-hospital medical workers is higher - possible because of initial exposure to greater viral load?
To apply this IFR projection to a population would need to know (or assign) rate of infection? California population = 40 million, if 50% infection rate (low estimate) 20 million get infected and of those, (x 0.00689 IFR) 137,800 die? Is this correct? What is rate of infection?
“Since I had a minute”! Yeah way to go making the rest of us feel like statistics zeros! 
I suggest that as the virus continues to make its way through the population the IFR will drop over time as the pool of uninfected vulnerable people shrinks. The theory would be that the immuno-compromised are more susceptible to infection under the same conditions of exposure.
This one is good and in line with the other studies you mention. https://www.medrxiv.org/content/10.1101/2020.04.15.20067074v2 …
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.