Isn't there much indicating that the number is much higher, like 10-20x more than confirmed?
-
-
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
The median is very broad: over tenfold from low end to high.
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
BIG margins of error though (median range of 171 to 1,090), so broadly consistent with known case numbers. It reads as though estimating prevalence from [RNA] is a long way from an exact science at this point.
-
Definitely true! I don't think waste water surveillance will ever replace other testing, but it's an interesting datapoint
End of conversation
New conversation -
-
-
So how many people have actually died if we are only posting tested numbers?
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.