2/n Study is here:https://www.thelancet.com/journals/lanchi/article/PIIS2352-4642(20)30095-X/fulltext#seccestitle40 …
-
-
Show this thread
-
3/n The basic question? Will closing schools prevent or slow the spread of coronavirus The basic answer? We don't really know (THE ETERNAL TRUTH)
Show this thread -
4/n The study itself is a rapid systematic review, which basically means the authors searched the literature (in mid-March) to look at all studies published on the topic of school closures and various respiratory disease outbreaks

pic.twitter.com/7lCreRBlk5
Show this thread -
5/n cont. and then rapidly collated and analyzed these studies They specifically looked for things relating to coronaviruses (i.e SARS and MERS) as well as the current novel coronavirus
Show this thread -
6/n What did they find? - 6 studies evaluating school closures for SARS - 2 modeling studies for SARS - 1 interview study for SARS - 5 preprints of school closures in China for COVID19 - 1 preprint of other human coronaviruses - 1 Imperial College modelpic.twitter.com/u8WealVXZD
Show this thread -
7/n Confusingly this is both a very broad pool of evidence (lots of information) and also not very helpful in giving us evidence (limited in scope) The challenge of causal inferences in epidemiology
Show this thread -
8/n For example, one preprint looked at Hong Kong, and found that school closures in combination with other measures reduced the R(eff) below 1 Great
Except, hard to know what role school closures themselves played
pic.twitter.com/kI1YL7ZS6z
Show this thread -
9/n Some published work on SARS examined school closures and had mixed findings


Maybe a benefit, but maybe not - hard to say!pic.twitter.com/3NdAF8A7yB
Show this thread -
10/n Another study looked at coronaviruses during snow days
in Seattle in 2019 and found a reduction in other coronavirus infections of ~6%
Not shabby, but hard to compare to our current situationpic.twitter.com/uz0rP55mZM
Show this thread -
11/n Which brings us to the modelling studies This is actually where things get much more complexpic.twitter.com/2woeBo1hix
Show this thread -
12/n The problem with some modelling studies is that they aren't necessarily *evidence* in the traditional sense What you can find is that the information you are looking for is ASSUMED in the model, rather than demonstrated by it
Show this thread -
13/n
This is actually exactly what we find when we look at the Imperial model
They ASSUMED that school closures would reduce transmission by a set amount, and then predicted how many deaths this would eliminate if that were truepic.twitter.com/GPPY5hvNet
Show this thread -
14/n Other models similarly ASSUMED things about SARS and COVID-19, and similarly concluded that school closures might be effective if these things were true But again, these are not demonstrating efficacy, they are putting a number on closures IF they workpic.twitter.com/pP5HXxd4Vk
Show this thread -
15/n The flipside to this is that we know very well the negative social implications of school closures
They are not great for a whole host of reasonspic.twitter.com/DJ3xkTQDVP
Show this thread -
16/n Which brings us to the MAIN FINDING of this systematic review There isn't much data


We really don't know how great a policy school closures may be, especially considering the societal impact of the policypic.twitter.com/NtCIFZ8FPb
Show this thread -
17/n As a package intervention, it seems that school closures may be effective, but we have no real idea what role they played in reducing transmissionpic.twitter.com/Ab3ozYsFff
Show this thread -
18/n On the other hand, there isn't even much insight into non-closure options for schools No one has so far looked into how we might socially distance children without closing schools entirely Is it possible
No ideapic.twitter.com/YGZO8YGjrd
Show this thread -
19/n In addition to this, the only modelling study to look at school closures separately, which also assumed that they were effective, found a "relatively marginal" impact from the interventionpic.twitter.com/n9dp3wHUJK
Show this thread -
20/n We also don't know to what extent non-school social gatherings play a role in transmission, and whether these may lower the impact of school closures as wellpic.twitter.com/sCEXqbgzRf
Show this thread -
21/n It's also worth noting that the 2-4% figure that you may've heard on the news or from certain celebrity doctors is from a model ASSUMING that school closures do indeed work
Show this thread -
22/n Which brings us to the conclusions of this policy-focused review What should countries do? Well, Taiwan and China may be a guide - school closures early, but one of the first measures to be scaled backpic.twitter.com/6un7nUszJ1
Show this thread -
23/n However, given that we aren't sure how effective school closures may have been - potentially quite effective - we should consider OTHER ways to minimize transmission while opening thempic.twitter.com/TtcJIF66P9
Show this thread -
24/n It's unlikely that we can keep schools closed forever, but there may be ways to reduce harms without the enormous cost of closing them completelypic.twitter.com/yN1MGAviMw
Show this thread -
25/n So...do school closures work to prevent the spread of
#COVID19? WE DON'T KNOW They probably help, but maybe not that much and have some definite harmsShow this thread -
26/n And while dumping on Dr. Oz is fun, he's not entirely misrepresenting the evidence when he says that school closures may have an overall detrimental effect during this pandemic
Show this thread -
27/n (Although, to be fair, he says it in a MUCH more absurd way. Fuck, who calls 2-3% of deaths trivial? Ugh)
Show this thread
End of conversation
New conversation -
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.