Asymptomatic *at the time of screening.* Follow-up was limited (~2 days). 3 (10%) showed symptoms before discharge.https://twitter.com/ASlavitt/status/1249904502687305729 …
-
-
Replying to @aetiology
Yes this annoyed me as well. Also, screened at presentation for delivery or during delivery? If the latter, could've been infected in hospital but not yet showing symptoms!
3 replies 2 retweets 13 likes -
Replying to @GidMK @aetiology
Most hospitals are moving to testing at presentation to L&D - also, not sure what you mean by it being nosocomial if + at delivery- usually thats not going to be more than 24 hours after admission..
2 replies 1 retweet 6 likes -
Replying to @SaskiaPopescu @aetiology
Sorry, to clarify I meant screened at any point in their admission (which could be a bit longer than 24 hours) - given that it's just correspondence, the text doesn't make this clear
1 reply 0 retweets 1 like -
Replying to @GidMK @aetiology
For sure- my gut says (just based off what is being recommended for L&D) they did it upon admission, as they have to have different process in place if mom is + to reduce exposure for the baby.
1 reply 0 retweets 1 like -
Replying to @SaskiaPopescu @aetiology
Makes sense. They do report screening for symptoms on arrival, but the testing is vague in terms of timeline which was why I was not surepic.twitter.com/TgvANJgekN
2 replies 0 retweets 1 like -
Replying to @GidMK @aetiology
That last line makes me think on admission but the verbiage is not great :( ugh.
1 reply 0 retweets 1 like
Lol, hard to say! Hopefully it'll be published as a proper study soon so we can know for sure
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.