@SequencingCom what exactly are you using to base this report on? Anyone have any opinions on this?? I'm going for heap of
@US_FDA @codushlaine @GidMK @DrRobertOConnor @ricanney @TheSciBabepic.twitter.com/eGzvrD3Vtp
You can add location information to your Tweets, such as your city or precise location, from the web and via third-party applications. You always have the option to delete your Tweet location history. Learn more
Also seems to rely heavily on variants in ACE2 gene and studies from SARS/MERS infection. A bit of a leap considering this part in one of your listed references. "several key residues responsible for the binding.. were variable in 2019-nCoV". Dubious and misleading.pic.twitter.com/sQ5sQStrfQ
Indeed. Things like this are why I think direct-to-consumer genetic testing is often a bit of a scam
There are more than 20 genetic associations of SARS-CoV-1 and SARS-CoV-2 used. Not sure where you obtained your “1 or 2” studies from. See the DNA Data section near bottom of this example report:https://sequencing.com/dna-apps/coronavirus-dna-health-report/example/adult1-multifactorial-risks …
Each association is supported by, as I said, 1 or 2 studies. I had a look at the references you cite, I would personally not feel comfortable giving anyone any advice whatsoever based on those findings
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.