6 months ago: 1 epidemiologist per 100,000 population
Today: 100,000 epidemiologists per 100,000 population #epitwitter
The assumptions were extremely suspect and almost certainly wrong. The actual modelling I've seen from pandemic modelling experts looks vastly different, but honestly you don't need to see that to note that the piece was massively flawed
-
-
I appreciate you think that, but if you go to the effort of writing an article dismissing it, as a reader I would have appreciated specific criticisms so we are more informed. Instead it seems like lazy dismissal. I would be surprised if
@yaneerbaryam missed major flaws in it. -
It was not the only absurd prediction, so I wrote addressing them all. I could spend 7,000 words addressing every piece of nonsense out there, but that's the problem with nonsense. Always more to debunk than there is time to do it
- Show replies
New conversation -
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.