Once they have testing resources they can do that. Until then, let the soldiers decide - it is their health and the health of other patients that is on the line.
But I still disagree wholeheartedly with the idea that our current approach doesn't give any valuable information
-
-
Well I agree we learn a lot even by convenience testing... I'm arguing we could learn more per test conducted and still address the I'll w/ SRS or active learning, using antibody tests w/ clinical follow up, especially given evidence of asymptotic transmission.
-
I'll = ill
End of conversation
New conversation -
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.
you seem to not even be able to consider the possibility that this is a good idea despite the fact that some forms of it are being implemented globally. I'm simply saying can't we consider some systematic surveillance testing. Your position seems dogmatic to me.