That being said, a sugar tax that is used to fund healthy eating programs is a solid public health intervention with very strong evidential backing
-
-
Show this threadThanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
- Show replies
New conversation -
-
In other news, the earth is not flat!
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
Don't you thing consuming excess calories through sugar is easier? I don't see people drinking olive oil or any oil like they drink sugary soft drinks. Even if what you say is factually true I don't see how it's helpful
-
Unless you're drinking your calories, it's usually much easier to get the excess from fat (I.e. fries) than sugar
- Show replies
New conversation -
-
-
Epidemiology is useless.
-
Odd that everyone who says nonsense like that still avoids asbestos

- Show replies
New conversation -
-
-
If we used the GRADE system to score your comments they would be in the low value, same as a nb of vegans like Gregger, Davis, McDougall. My health got extremely better since i have been doing my own due diligence. Everybody have their own theories but real data is powerful.
-
My comments are based on systematic reviews using GRADE
- Show replies
New conversation -
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.