"The funder had no decisive role in the design, implementation, analysis, and interpretation of the data" Three of the authors were employed by Nestle
-
-
Show this thread
-
Study is here, and just...wow?https://academic.oup.com/ajcn/advance-article-abstract/doi/10.1093/ajcn/nqz306/5686860?redirectedFrom=fulltext …
Show this thread -
Here's the table of secondary results that has made all of these headlines happen THIS IS ABSURDpic.twitter.com/H6KMfJmGDS
Show this thread -
Things that coffee did not benefit in this trial: - blood sugar - weight - fat free mass - fatty acids - insulin - blood pressure - heart rate - cholesterol - waist circumference Things that coffee had a tiny effect on: - creatinine - total fat mass
Show this thread -
Things that were reported as if miraculous: - total fat mass Things that were totally ignored: EVERYTHING ELSE
Show this thread -
I'd argue that this study demonstrates quite convincingly that coffee is likely worthless for weight loss and diabetes And yet, this is the lead author discussing the results of the research Science reporting is soooo brokenpic.twitter.com/Gw21ewZAVk
Show this thread -
If you ask me, the loss of fat mass in coffee drinkers in this study is likely to be a statistical artifact, given that they ran 31 ANCOVAs and happened upon 2 significant results Remember, there was no weight loss, no fat free mass loss, no other differences at all!
Show this thread
End of conversation
New conversation -
-
-
No wonder people are confused about what's a healthy lifestyle.
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
...and some of the articles are saying “just” four cups
. Most of us would be 


-
I'd have wasted away if this were true
End of conversation
New conversation -
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.