Scientist: here's a fact based on decades of research Fool: have you considered these objections I found on Youtube? Scientist: ...yes Fool: what about this from InfoWars Scientist: that's a supplement ad Fool: I don't know who to believe
-
-
If you're not an expert but you think you've destroyed the entire foundation of a vast scientific edifice with 10 minutes of Googling, you might want to consider the possibility that you could be wrong
Show this threadThanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
So you're saying there's not a tiny universe in my fingernail?
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
*Fool: Yeah, but you didn’t see this book by an MD who understands why conventional medicine has it all wrong. Scientist: You mean the guy who hides behind the veneer of his “credibility” to peddle scams/books to ignorant folk like you who he “helped save?”
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
OTOH, I know of examples where scientists have thought less than 5 minutes about that 1 of the 173 tested hypotheses that reached the international news
-
Fair point, scientists are definitely not perfect!
End of conversation
New conversation -
-
-
Don't bring weed into this
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
It does remain a massive, complex *theory* though. Most of the arguments I see are because many treat that theory as absolute, religious truth. Just my observation.
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
Unless the "scientists" are psychologists, in which case it might be true.
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
But not impossible!
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.