Consider a prespecified secondary RCT endpoint that is missing 50% of the time. Is it okay to not report it *at all*?
-
-
Exactly. I would go so far as to say, its okay to not calculate sig tests (if you believe that is right), report alongside sensitivity analyses and to relegate to a supplement with lots of caveats and limitations around it. But it isn't okay to not do it at all.
-
Yeah, this is another scenario. If the you powered the study and set your alpha such that significance/non-significance corresponds to an actual decision, your data are now underpowered relative to that decision, and it might be fair to scrap the result.
- Show replies
New conversation -
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.