Consider a prespecified secondary RCT endpoint that is missing 50% of the time. Is it okay to not report it *at all*?
-
-
Replying to @venkmurthy
If there's a sufficiently good explanation, sure. Say if you originally had access to a specific scan but it was then lost halfway through the trial, might bias the results and make them useless anyway
1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @venkmurthy
Time-varying or crossover RCTs would have an issue. Might not be a problem in your standard 2-group design, depends on the situation
2:45 PM - 17 Dec 2019
0 replies
0 retweets
1 like
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.