Ah the old "I checked with an expert" canard. Much like nutrition-chronic disease studies, for every expert in nutrition, there's an equal and opposite expert. Thread on the problems of expertise, because this (there's more upthread of tweet below, so read that too) 1/:https://twitter.com/GidMK/status/1203604334165909504 …
Whose experts? Whose science? Plenty of people tossing fake news accusations about vaccines claiming expertise, why do you trust the mainstream scientists above them?
-
-
Annals of Internal Medicine vs. Lancet
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
Ah the old "mainstream" canard. The division of mainstream vs. fringe is also a rhetorical one. So, in nutrition, I'm talking about mainstream vs. mainstream. Who is/isn't "mainstream" now, Willett or Ioannidis? Katz or Allison?
-
I was referring to vaccine science there, but I do think it raises a good point - do you think every disagreement in nutrition is as big a divide as the recent row over meat?
- Show replies
New conversation -
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.