Lol you're the fourth person to tag me in it. Paper isn't up online last I checked so no word from me yet, but it sounds extremely dodgy at face value
Ok, so thoughts: - no good correction for SES (issue) - very vague correlations here. No biological gradient, various 'significant' interactions but...meh - even in this high-risk cohort, absolute risk increase for the HIGHEST group was 0.05%
-
-
Also, exposure was ascertained from a SINGLE QUESTIONNAIRE given once at the start of the study Hair dyeing behaviour is almost certain to vary, making this a pretty pointless study imo
-
Oh, also, the p-value for any hair dye was 0.05, because honestly that relationship was anything but certain. I find even the analyses pretty unconvincing
- Show replies
New conversation -
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.