Lol if you want some references that I imagine you'll refuse to read: https://academic.oup.com/cid/article/52/7/911/299077 … http://op12no2.me/stuff/herdhis.pdf … https://academic.oup.com/ije/article/23/6/1300/660409 …https://royalsocietypublishing.org/doi/abs/10.1098/rspb.2006.3636 …
-
This Tweet is unavailable.
-
-
This Tweet is unavailable.
-
Replying to @TheMelt
It's already been validated hundreds of times. Given that, you can back-calculate vaccination rates from the number of infections because R0*Vaccination rate=R
0 replies 0 retweets 0 likes -
This Tweet is unavailable.
-
Replying to @TheMelt
You can't. Like it said, the basic function is simple maths, it's logically consistent. You can perhaps argue about whether vaccines can ACHIEVE herd immunity, but otherwise it's simply R0*%(Population resistant to disease)=R
2 replies 0 retweets 1 like -
This Tweet is unavailable.
-
-
This Tweet is unavailable.
-
Replying to @TheMelt
HAHAHAHA So you literally don't have an argument here. Good to know
1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes
I mean, you're telling me I don't know the science but you've never even heard of an R0
Might be worth doing some very basic reading on herd immunity and vaccines before getting into arguments about it. Have a great day 
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.