Lol if you want some references that I imagine you'll refuse to read: https://academic.oup.com/cid/article/52/7/911/299077 … http://op12no2.me/stuff/herdhis.pdf … https://academic.oup.com/ije/article/23/6/1300/660409 …https://royalsocietypublishing.org/doi/abs/10.1098/rspb.2006.3636 …
-
This Tweet is unavailable.
-
-
This Tweet is unavailable.
-
Replying to @TheMelt
It's already been validated hundreds of times. Given that, you can back-calculate vaccination rates from the number of infections because R0*Vaccination rate=R
0 replies 0 retweets 0 likes -
This Tweet is unavailable.
-
Replying to @TheMelt
You can't. Like it said, the basic function is simple maths, it's logically consistent. You can perhaps argue about whether vaccines can ACHIEVE herd immunity, but otherwise it's simply R0*%(Population resistant to disease)=R
2 replies 0 retweets 1 like -
This Tweet is unavailable.
-
Replying to @TheMelt
All of the assumptions have been tested, I'm sorry to say that you're just wrong here
0 replies 0 retweets 0 likes -
This Tweet is unavailable.
You're just contradicting me without providing any actual arguments here. Very boring. "There are too many variables" - which ones? How do they impact the maths?
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.