@venkmurthy sometimes you've just gotta love these papers don't you
-
-
Show this thread
-
I mean, the 419,000 number is basically immaterial The paper is entirely based on the subset of 2,160 people And EVEN THEN most of the figures are based on 450 or fewer people MUCH less impressive, I'd say
Show this thread
End of conversation
New conversation -
-
-
Wait, what??? (and yet we have to jump through hoops to get our papers published :-(
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.

)