But then, a further 7 were excluded because of 'poor hydration compliance' What does this mean? Essentially, the researchers thought they were drinking more/less water than their experimental conditionpic.twitter.com/PJXeqv0IG5
You can add location information to your Tweets, such as your city or precise location, from the web and via third-party applications. You always have the option to delete your Tweet location history. Learn more
So, after all of this, what did the study find? Hilariously, there was NO EFFECT of water intake (AL/Low/High) on any cognitive test!!!!pic.twitter.com/kC75Y16GdT
In other words, the PRIMARY FINDINGS of this research project is that drinking more/less water DOESN'T IMPACT CHILDREN'S PERFORMANCE ON COGNITIVE TASKS That's the exact opposite of what the media reportedpic.twitter.com/uaa7gSlEpu
What they DID find, and what was then converted into the headlines, was that if you look WITHIN GROUPS, there were some statistically significant trends, where better urine markers of hydration led to better accuracy on the testspic.twitter.com/8m5mwUGbVF
I.e. if you look just at kids when they were in the AL condition (drinking as much water as they wanted), those who had more concentrated urine appeared to be slightly less accurate on some cognitive tests
But remember - there was no difference between conditions In other words, perhaps dehydration affects cognition, but drinking more/less water doesn't appear to make any difference
Here's the main table of results As you can see, there are really very few differences between the three groups on any test for reaction time or accuracypic.twitter.com/jdzJ4do8AH
Moreover, it's very hard to tell if the statistical tests were controlled for multiple comparisons, which is concerning because many of the p-values were between 0.03-0.05pic.twitter.com/kCMktXnc3t
And, reminder, this was an industry-funded trial, which makes the reporting of the apparently negative findings even more worrying
Also worth noting that the study didn't really look at multitasking per se, this was based on an extrapolation from the within-group tests that looked at cognitive load!
TO RECAP: - industry-funded trial - potential issues with study design - strange numbers - results NEGATIVE for primary outcome - didn't look at multitasking - somehow still reported as "water helps multitasking"
P.S. I forgot to mention that I don't think you can call a trial measuring low water intake to high water intake a trial of water It's a trial of dehydrationpic.twitter.com/g6Hv4gyR0h
I mean, imagine measuring cognitive ability in people who hadn't eaten in days vs those who'd eaten plenty It's a ridiculous thing to test in the first place!
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.