-
-
Show this thread
-
I mean, leaving aside the fact that none of this could ever possibly be considered causal, the 'SEVEN TIMES' risk from the Mail is based on a difference of just 8 children between the groupspic.twitter.com/kEgJ2Hw7jN
Show this thread -
But returning to the causality argument - you can't say that being an only child has ANY INFLUENCE WHATSOEVER based on this study
Show this thread -
For one thing, these children were 2-4 years' old They might not be only children for much longer!pic.twitter.com/rDRX3qESS5
Show this thread -
Could just be that 'first' children, regardless of whether they have siblings, are more likely to be obese Or one of 100,000 other factors!
Show this thread -
New conversation -
-
-
Only child AND registered dietitian checking in
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
‘In the new study, researchers from the University of Oklahoma looked at the eating habits of 68 youngsters over one week.’ 68 kids. One US state. One week. And it’s reported as fact.
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.