If you've ever wondered why it's worth checking the methodology of a systematic review VERY closely, I just read one where EVERY SINGLE STUDY imputed missing values with last observation carried forward but didn't mention that anywhere in the text 
-
-
Replying to @GidMK @EvidenceRobot
Curious if you noticed via the tables, critical appraisal, or through reaching out to the authors?
1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @karadecorby @EvidenceRobot
Read all the included studies and they mention it
1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @GidMK @EvidenceRobot
More than your average critical appraisal then! Do you always read the primary studies, or only if using for particular decisions, CPG dev’t, etc?
1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @karadecorby @EvidenceRobot
Not always, but I think it's good practice to glance through them if you're going to make any decisions based on the review
1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @GidMK @EvidenceRobot
Thanks, always interested in the amount of digging necessary to surface any fatal flaws.
1 reply 0 retweets 1 like
To be fair, it wasn't a very good review anyway, but that was a truly killer thing to totally ignore
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.