-
-
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
I think there is a meaningful difference between debating naturopaths or anti-vaxxers or goopers on Twitter and pointing out that single studies that receive hype and clickbaity headlines are based on weak evidence. I would say
@GidMK does the latterThanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
They’re both worth ripping into, and there are different ways of reaching different audiences
-
Agreed. I don't see the argument for one or the other, and I honestly have no idea what
@VPrasadMDMPH is trying to do here - Show replies
New conversation -
-
-
And many (not all) of them are also helping patients improve their health. What then?
- End of conversation
New conversation -
-
-
And what about pesticide corporations and tampon manufacturers? Those "fighting" alternative medicine NEVER criticize them and in fact defend their toxic practices.
#FakeExperts http://beachvetlbc.blogspot.com/2018/11/real-news-cheating-death-with-dr-jen.html …Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.