I should say - there was one product with relatively high levels of arsenic. The point was really that most were probably fine, not that there are no products at all that might need to look at their practices
It's a question of dose again. Finding amounts of contaminants doesn't really mean anything, and usually the FDA and the EFSA set really conservative legal limits, particularly for drinking water
-
-
Also, I'm always cautious of the EWG's 'studies', they are an industry-funded organisation that often over-hypes the fear to sell their own products instead of say tap water, which is usually the safest thing you can drink
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.