New idea for a science communication account a la mice and risks: tweet out the numbers in the studies involved For example, this study n=30https://www.dailymail.co.uk/health/article-7589073/Working-stomach-breakfast-help-fight-type-2-diabetes.html …
-
Show this thread
-
Replying to @GidMK
Micers have been kicking this around for a while. There are times when it's... eye opening. IN FOUR MICE
1 reply 0 retweets 8 likes -
Replying to @jamesheathers
Somehow I honestly wonder how they get ethics approval to raise and kill half a dozen animals for their shitty underpowered study
1 reply 0 retweets 4 likes -
Replying to @GidMK @jamesheathers
Because the people reviewing the grant / ethics applications don’t understand this either. I reviewed an application once for someone that said their power calculation told them they needed n=2 animals per group.
4 replies 1 retweet 6 likes
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.