New idea for a science communication account a la mice and risks: tweet out the numbers in the studies involved For example, this study n=30https://www.dailymail.co.uk/health/article-7589073/Working-stomach-breakfast-help-fight-type-2-diabetes.html …
The other issue is that post-hoc power calculations are intrinsically flawed, so they'd be a bit meaningless anyway. You'd have to compile a power calculation based on previously published literature and some assumptions, which would be so much effort