Nah mate, there's nothing cool about you making bombastic claims unsupported by evidence.
-
-
This conversation is a joke. You have not presented a case for harm against published evidence of benefit & clinical expertise Especially considering prediabetes, diabetes, GDM all have indication for gylcemic mentoring anyway the case for harm is even more bizarre
2 replies 0 retweets 0 likes -
-
Sorry, just to be clear: your primary argument for the use of CGM beyond T2DM is "clinical experience"?
1 reply 0 retweets 2 likes -
I believe sufficient evidence exists consider use in prediabetes and gdm. Based on my clinical experience would add in weight mananbent in overweight and obese, reactive hypoglycemia, hyperinsulinemia...
2 replies 0 retweets 0 likes -
But you didn't provide any of that evidence when I asked... That being said, sounds like you're practicing eminence-based medicine. Might want to have a look at some of the articles on why that isn't usually a good choice
1 reply 0 retweets 1 like -
Im open to evidence of harm. Please show me
1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes -
You don't need evidence of harm for something that costs quite a lot of money you need evidence of ~benefit~
1 reply 0 retweets 1 like -
Replying to @GidMK @DoctorTro and
Alternately, I have a wonderful healing gel that is totally unresearched, costs $5,000 a pop, but cures diabetes I'd be happy to sell you hundreds of samples, based on my expertise it's amazingly effective!
2 replies 0 retweets 1 like -
Okay that’s cool
1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes
Sarcasm aside, if you're treating people with pre-diabetes with CGM you should do an RCT because if you could demonstrate a benefit we could use it for a funding case so please do that 
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.