I think the issues with overscreening are a really hard thing for most doctors to get, because they are extremely counterintuitive. @venkmurthy has some excellent tweetorials on issues similar to the (potential) overuse of CGM
-
This Tweet is unavailable.
-
-
Replying to @GidMK @DoctorTro
Thank you for your support but this man seems intolerant of disagreement. His immediate instinct to jump to ad hominems suggests he prefers to be at the base of Graham's pyramid rather than at the apex: https://rationalwiki.org/wiki/Hierarchy_of_disagreement …pic.twitter.com/C53rNBy3iB
1 reply 0 retweets 2 likes -
Replying to @venkmurthy @GidMK
How can you explain to an ignorant person that is otherwise educated that they know nothing about what they are taking about... let’s start with this ... have you ever written a script for a CGM, have you reviewed what a report looks like ? Ad hominem is easier than explaining
1 reply 0 retweets 2 likes -
It would be a lot easier if you just admitted you really don’t know what your talking about - but yeah sure you can call me names, does it make you feel better?
1 reply 0 retweets 1 like
Well, I've never treated a patient, but I have looked at several thousand CGM findings and done quite a bit of analysis. I personally think you could potentially demonstrate some cost-efficacy for people who are pre-diabetic, but I doubt very much that's true for normoglycemia
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.