“a new measurement tool, known as GRADE, which was developed to evaluate pharmaceuticals. GRADE turns out to be a deeply flawed methodology for evaluating the impacts of lifestyle intervention.” GRADE = 20yrs old method. Sorry. But this demo’s how far behind some folk really arehttps://twitter.com/TrueHealthINIT/status/1179467677867397124 …
-
-
Replying to @dnunan79
Have you seen David Katz's critique? Similarly one of the most ridiculous things I've read, completely misses the pointpic.twitter.com/NHl7wIZACr
1 reply 0 retweets 1 like -
Replying to @GidMK
I have. I thought it was light on substance and heavy on rhetoric. And the pejorative use of ‘statisticians’ just blocks out any good points for me. Also have a look at what he says about meta-analyses (including smaller studies, mixed outcomes, study lengths). What you think?
2 replies 0 retweets 4 likes
I can't find the part where he specifically discusses meta-analysis? The whole piece reads like a pointless diatribe though-he makes all of the reasonable arguments against the studies but it's buried in a flood of pointless vitriol and factually incorrect nonsense
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.