What do meta-analysts do when faced with an effect size akin to "the effect of intra-cranial bullets on lifespan"? Do you make a subjective decision to reject it, or do you leave it in because it's not precluded by The Great Plan? Do you have preset criteria to reject big d? https://t.co/2UbuTS5uRH
I'd get fussy if I'd just proved that water is wet using 12 groups of 8 undergraduate students who showed up half-drunk so that they could scrape through their first year psych course
-
-
Yeah but u are a v fussy man so swings and roundaboots m8
-
I'm about as fussy as a half-baked sloth, apparently that's more than some
- Show replies
New conversation -
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.