Previous systematic reviews have looked over the evidence and concluded that there is evidence of harm, but of low certainty
-
-
Show this thread
-
In contrast, the new study has taken an alternative approach - very similar findings, but arguing that the low certainty of the result does not provide sufficient evidence to justify recommendations to lower meat consumption
Show this thread -
This really shows just how challenging it can be to interpret SR/MAs Both arguments are based on the same evidence!
Show this thread
End of conversation
New conversation -
-
-
#Carnivores on Twitter. We told you so. Meat isn't junk food, but it's eaten with it all the time which confounds it. Go#keto or#carnivore -
If that's your take-home from this study then I'd argue you are being inconsistent with your evidential appraisal The main argument from the study authors is just that most people can probably keep eating the amount of red meat that they currently do
- Show replies
New conversation -
-
-
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.