Epidemiology can only give associations which is why we still aren't sure whether smoking causes cancer or if asbestos is bad for your healthhttps://twitter.com/lowcarbGP/status/1171398253834883073 …
-
-
Again fair point but I was alluding specifically to the use of these studies by the press
-
But surely that's not a phenomenon limited to epidemiology? Bit unfair to characterize an entire discipline by the misrepresentations in the tabloids
- Show replies
New conversation -
-
-
Smoking: Relative Risk 20-30 Nutrition: Relative Risk 1.1-1.5 (on a good day)
-
You hit the nail on the head
End of conversation
New conversation -
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.