They didn't, for example, control for maternal alcohol or drug intake, which can both have a HUGE impact on childrens' mental health
-
Show this thread
-
The absolute risk increase was also pretty miniscule Kids exposed to no stress had a 0.5% risk of developing personality disorders Kids exposed to some stress had a 1.6% risk Triple the odds, but only 1.1% risk increase!pic.twitter.com/qTpdRcW2oP
1 reply 1 retweet 5 likesShow this thread -
Also, the study assessed stress using one questionnaire given partway through the pregnancy in 1975, which I'd argue is...problematic
1 reply 1 retweet 4 likesShow this thread -
On top of all of this, the study used a statistical technique called logistic regression Without going into the details, this is very questionable for a study like this
1 reply 1 retweet 2 likesShow this thread -
Basically, if you have too few outcomes (i.e. only 40) in your sample, and include a bunch of covariates in the statistical model, you end up with a bit of a meaningless result I mean, just look at those confidence intervals!pic.twitter.com/kIKGKcoSov
1 reply 1 retweet 5 likesShow this thread -
(As a side note, there appear to be a few numerical errors in the paper, such as this one in the table above)pic.twitter.com/XB7m1aiQ20
1 reply 1 retweet 3 likesShow this thread -
If you read that table, kids exposed to "any" stress have 3.37x the odds of having any diagnosis of personality disorders, but the confidence interval goes from 1.61x to 7.07x That's ~huge~
1 reply 1 retweet 2 likesShow this thread -
TL:DR: - association between stress in pregnancy and kids getting personality disorders - very weak - risk increase is tiny - statistical analysis is problematic - HUGE potential for residual confounding - ALMOST CERTAINLY NOT SOMETHING FOR MUMS TO WORRY ABOUT
1 reply 1 retweet 6 likesShow this thread -
Now, while the media certainly had a role to play in the misinterpretation of this study, I think the problem started in the conclusions This is not well worded at allpic.twitter.com/cIm8jvpLvi
1 reply 1 retweet 4 likesShow this thread -
The authors have been quoted elsewhere saying that this definitely isn't causal, but if you read the conclusions of the study it sounds like it absolutely is That's a huge problem
1 reply 1 retweet 8 likesShow this thread
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.