By the criteria used for defining Stevia as "natural", sucralose, which is technically derived mostly from sugar cane, is also "natural"
-
-
Show this thread
-
Also, there are similar impacts on things like microbiome and hormones from stevia as other sweeteners, so it's a moot point anyway
Show this thread -
This is why the technical term has shifted from "artificial" sweeteners to "intense" sweeteners, because artificial is no longer very descriptive or usefulpic.twitter.com/oREFwnbF5P
Show this thread
End of conversation
New conversation -
-
-
.@WorldOfStu will volunteer to eat one metric ton of Stevia tomorrow if you ask him to...
-
Minus the crushed hamsters...
End of conversation
New conversation -
-
-
What do you mean by chemical? Like, isn't water the chemical H2O?
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
One can only wonder why food brands declare thugs that are not in the product and not declare everything what it is that you are putting it not your mouth. It’s a form of delusion and hiding truth, in common sense wording.
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
I don’t mean to be rude, but I believe you forgot to mention an important piece of information... it tastes awful.
-
I don't mind the flavour tbh
- Show replies
New conversation -
-
-
I
stevia and I don't care if it's just like sugar or isn't natural. Using the liquid stevia in my tea has gotten me off the pepsi and have lost 62 lbs so far. I'm sure the stevia is better for me than being almost 100 lbs overweight was. -
Great to be off the Pepsi. The next step is to get used to water rather than intensely sweet drinks.
End of conversation
New conversation -
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.