I think if we're being honest with ourselves, journalists should know we CAN'T always spot flawed research. That's why it's so important to get outside comment! (Psst @RealSciLine, @STATSorg, and many uni/hospital PR depts can hook you up on deadline)https://twitter.com/JournoResource/status/1156189125453778944 …
-
-
Of course, depends what we mean by "flawed". I've read perhaps 2 studies ever that I could honestly say were entirely flawless in design and execution
-
Haha true
End of conversation
New conversation -
-
-
A complicating factor is you only ever see when journalists take the bait. You don't see the many many many who look at a study and decide not to cover.
-
Very true. Survivorship bias at its best!
End of conversation
New conversation -
-
-
Oh man. Understatement of the YEAR.
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.