HAHAHAHAHAHA HAHAHAHAHA HAHAHA HA Nohttps://twitter.com/johnzahorik/status/1155732803377496064 …
-
-
I know right?! Payment for tweeting would be glorious
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
It’s crazy how you (and others) need to justify that you DON’T get paid for being great scientific writers. Yet pseudoscience and misinformation are making a mint! Let me be clear. You SHOULD get paid.
-
The other side of the coin is that the rise in experts who are willing to write sensible stuff for free is one of the things that is putting journos out of a job ... But I don't think that's a bad thing.
End of conversation
New conversation -
-
-
What I think is kind of amusing is that nearly the whole thread is invisible to me because I've previously blocked pretty much all the people in it

-
Lol love it
End of conversation
New conversation -
-
-
I believe you and I don't object if you do make money as an influencer. I see that you write for the Guardian so you have the platform to do so. I'm surprised you've never been approached. My issue is intellectual honesty.
-
John. Go and have a look at the content of Marika Sboros and Ken Berry if you want to discuss intellectual honesty.
- Show replies
New conversation -
-
-
"a shill for big nuts" is the phrase that applies to me at our porn shop.
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
Love the idea that somebody at Big Nut is thinking "hmm, we do press releases and get tons of coverage, but what we REALLY need is one guy tweeting that our study sucks. Surely nobody will do that on their own so we've gotta budget for it"
-
A lot of weird shit happens in media and advertising, but...that is not it
End of conversation
New conversation -
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.