-
-
At the absolute minimum, trials like this usually present per-protocol analyses alongside less misleading results from an intention-to-treat analysispic.twitter.com/olSGRYJQ8b
Show this thread -
Why did the researchers choose such a problematic method to analyse their results? Impossible to know. But it might be to do with the funding bodypic.twitter.com/S28MCBBeq4
Show this thread -
Yes, the study on semen and sex quality was funded by - and I cannot believe I get to say this - Big Nut You cannot make this up, it's too good
Show this thread -
Also worth noting that the presentation in the media of this as a positive trial conflicts with the results, because for the majority of the things the researchers tested nuts made no difference
Show this thread -
I remain unconvinced that eating 60g of nuts a day will do anything whatsoever for your sex life, based on this researchpic.twitter.com/WvBWzZJVAi
Show this thread
End of conversation
New conversation -
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.