This is one of the times when I find the whole reporting of risk to be very annoying In this context? In a public health scenario? An increase of 0.18% is HUGEhttps://twitter.com/justsaysrisks/status/1153088518383476736 …
-
-
If a million people take the drugs for 5 years, they'll cause 10,000 events And on, and on
Show this thread -
The thing is, a risk doesn't need to be huge (21% increase!) to be massively impactful at the population scale End rant
Show this thread
End of conversation
New conversation -
-
-
Can you say “cause”? No randomisation here, could be big self-selection effects.
-
True, but I'm talking here more about the misunderstanding of risk rather than the complexities of observational research and causal inference
End of conversation
New conversation -
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.