(Actually technically it's IN RATS @justsaysinrats)
-
-
Show this thread
-
Show this thread
-
Basically, researchers suspended rats from their cages for a few weeks. Those who took a resveratrol supplement didn't lose as much function as the rats that didn't have the supplement in terms of paw grippic.twitter.com/SifjVLzVwG
Show this thread -
Even if we take these results at face value, the difference between astronauts on Mars and rats suspended from a cage is...not small Have a look if you don't believe mepic.twitter.com/SuFqAYosJi
Show this thread -
I mean, we can debate at length the usefulness of rodent models, but this is definitely a bit early to be calling it for good ol' resveratrol
Show this thread -
Also, if you look at the graphs from the study it's much less convincing The one on the left is the BIG finding, because the PWB40 group was the worst. The one on the right is apparently also a BIG finding, because the 7-day value for the PWB40 group was bad too
pic.twitter.com/Cbdj3aUsPU
Show this thread
End of conversation
New conversation -
-
-
I feel bad for the researchers who probably didn't want their study to be written about like this. Science journalism is so poor.
-
The study design is ridiculous too though... IMO they deserved the poor journalism
End of conversation
New conversation -
-
-
Very good news : Pichon Longueville-Baron ou Meursault and I am volunteer
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
Nitpick all you want, but I am not going to Mars without plenty of wine.
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.