Unpopular opinion: Biological plausibility as it's commonly wielded in the literature/twitter is literally the easiest criterion to meet for associations observed in nutrition epi and adds very little to whether or not the data are 'valid'.https://twitter.com/MaritKolby/status/1149650152933584896 …
Replying to @KCKlatt
I agree, it's very problematic. You can come up with a vague theory only supported by a couple of tiny animal trials but that's enough to argue that your epi findings are totally solid
3:55 PM - 12 Jul 2019
0 replies
0 retweets
4 likes
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.