I mean, we could take a non-frequentist approach and say that based on priors as well as the CI it's reasonable to make a connection there, but even so it's an amazing thing to omit from every report of the study
It looks like that one did try to control for weight loss, but without reading it really closely hard to know how much was due to weight loss or other things
-
-
Have you read the new Lancet paper on calorie restriction?? Love to get your thoughts. https://www.thelancet.com/journals/landia/article/PIIS2213-8587(19)30151-2/fulltext …
-
Lol I was just skimming it because of Liam's comment. No time to go through it now, but I'll have a look eventually
End of conversation
New conversation -
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.