That fact that everything else sucks.
It's something that should really be reported in the study itself. Given the general quality of this MA, it's very odd that they didn't do so, unless I'm wrong and there's a report buried in the supplementary materials somewhere
-
-
I'll admit, you've got me there.
-
Here we go, this is much more similar. Re-ran the model exponentiating differently. Looks like their basic analysis probably wasn't an error, although in the process I've found at least 2 minor numerical errors in the paper so it's a very mixed bagpic.twitter.com/HaxipIKC8F
- Show replies
New conversation -
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.
