Thanks for this but the conclusion bothers me "The low or unclear overall quality of the evidence prompts caution in interpreting the findings. New high-quality RCT research is necessary to enable more decisive interpretation.”
What are you judging them on? You've just said you don't feel comfortable rating MAs in terms of statistical design
-
-
Well, lack of wit for one thing.
-
That's not an evidential appraisal
- Show replies
New conversation -
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.