Love this story - unpublished research - presented at a conference - no actual information on the study at all - unclear funding - no information on randomization, blinding etc - n=20 (!) Quorn>milk? How could we possibly know???https://www.dailymail.co.uk/health/article-7208785/Protein-fungi-used-Quorn-builds-muscle-twice-fast-whey.html …
-
-
How can n=20 mean anything abt correlation, leave alone causation? The infamous 1998
@DrWakefield MMR paper had n=12 -
Sports science is always small numbers so that's not entirely unusual. Depends on the strength of the correlation. That being said, 20 is probably too few to make any realistic conclusions
- Show replies
New conversation -
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.