Love this story - unpublished research - presented at a conference - no actual information on the study at all - unclear funding - no information on randomization, blinding etc - n=20 (!) Quorn>milk? How could we possibly know???https://www.dailymail.co.uk/health/article-7208785/Protein-fungi-used-Quorn-builds-muscle-twice-fast-whey.html …
-
-
Yep!! I hate when a story makes the rounds based on a poster or worse yet somebody's brief mention in a talk. Everyone now feels like they have to cover, but there's no there there. Nothing to even send to an outside comment.
-
Absolutely. My team just had 5 posters accepted for a conference, and let me tell you I wouldn't base an actual story on any of them. Not that the research is bad, but there's only so much you can put into 250 words (no figures/tables)!
End of conversation
New conversation -
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.