glad you recognize that we're all allowed to have our opinions. I certainly wouldn't want to stop comrade Medicine from speaking his views. in free society nobody is immune from criticism, even allopath doctors.
-
-
In short, the poor choice of reviewers, the failure to differentiate methodologies, the additive method for studies, and the extremely suspicious 150 limit, as well as the completion of the report twice.
-
A poor choice of reviewer is not a methodological criticism. Different methodologies assumes that there are inherent differences between homeopathic treatments, in defiance of Hahnemann's principles. If 150 systematic reviews disagree with you, you're probably wrong
- Show replies
New conversation -
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.