It'd be interesting to know. From the study, it looks like they've identified that there are bacterial species missed by the usual tests, but I couldn't tell how that related back to a proportion of UTIs incorrectly diagnosed
That's really interesting stuff. I'm not sure where the figure of 50-80% is coming from, but it's definitely an important new testing methodology
-
-
This Tweet is unavailable.
-
- Show replies
-
-
-
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.