This is hilariously silly - observational study (of course people who go on more vacations are healthier!) - n=63(!) - NO CORRECTION FOR CONFOUNDERS - crazily abnormal sample (avg number of vacations was 5.5)https://www.dailymail.co.uk/health/article-7166543/Holidays-cut-risk-heart-disease.html …
-
-
But even more than that is the correlation/causation issue This study can't even begin to answer the question of whether holidays are good for healthpic.twitter.com/f4kEcy7l8Z
Show this thread -
All the researchers showed - literally the entirety of this study - is that people who go on more holidays are a bit healthier than people who don't THAT'S ALL
Show this thread -
Could holidays be making people more healthy? Perhaps Could people who go on more holidays be richer and less likely to have metabolic disease? WHAT DO YOU THINKpic.twitter.com/JCzGcyZum4
Show this thread -
And best of all, look at the p-value THE STUDY DIDN'T FIND A 'SIGNIFICANT' RESULT IT'S ALL JUST NONSENSEpic.twitter.com/fJOfluxMD0
Show this thread -
We can debate the relative importance of p-values, but if you're going to use a frequentist approach at least actually use it
Show this thread -
Best of all, I just did a bit of digging. Guess who the study is funded by?
Show this thread -
The answer that might not surprise you is the TRAVEL INDUSTRY Yes, the U.S. Travel Association provided the funds used to 'demonstrate' that vacations are good for your healthpic.twitter.com/r5gxvsOIXg
Show this thread -
Podcast is up on this nowhttps://twitter.com/GidMK/status/1143066757885595649?s=19 …
Show this thread
End of conversation
New conversation -
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.