I just wasted 2 hours writing about this, and I can't release it. The text is just luminously, stupidly angry. Basically one long threat with numbers in it. It's the single worst article I've read in years. I will content myself with this: let's thug it.https://twitter.com/jamesheathers/status/1142863287526277120 …
It looks like they describe 2 methods of calculating caloric intake, participants were also asked about their perceived cracker eating so it could just be that they've misreported everything as wellpic.twitter.com/slZ8fdD6H2
-
-
Actually, that might explain all the findings - overweight people might just be more likely to underestimate consumption when you put it in small boxes. That'd completely undermine the narrative, so double win I guess
-
That's EVEN WORSE. You have the actual, easily measured units there - one cracker = 28 calories or some shit, it's on the packet, and then assuming they don't smuggle them out in their cheek pouches like a goddamn squirrel, then they are content to GUESS what was eaten???
- Show replies
New conversation -
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.