-
-
There's absolutely no problem with exposure assessment in observational nutrition!
2 replies 0 retweets 10 likesShow this thread -
Replying to @KCKlatt
I reckon it's more likely to be a failing of their model or a bad definition of the term "cup"
1 reply 0 retweets 4 likes -
Sir Panda (Zad Rafi) Retweeted Will Hulme
@wjchulme made some important points here based on the abstracthttps://twitter.com/wjchulme/status/1135657625671127047?s=21 …Sir Panda (Zad Rafi) added,
Will Hulme @wjchulmeReplying to @dailyzad @david_colquhounSurrogate outcome. Indiscriminately adjusts for everything under the sun. Coffee consumption split into 3 groups [<1; 1-3; 3-25cups/day], so model assumes flat effect within each group, including +20cups/day where there'll be practically no data1 reply 0 retweets 2 likes
Looks like I was half right lol. Bet that one person who drinks 25 cups is proud of completely ruining any semblance of good science here
2:33 PM - 3 Jun 2019
0 replies
0 retweets
1 like
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.

