(Also, love that absolute and relative risk are included there, good job SMH)
-
-
Show this threadThanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
I'd like to believe that will provide balanced reporting, yet the very
@smh article you link then has a related link that has scientifically unsupported statements, promotes poor (illegal) use & references a scientific finding on hazard without a risk context#walkthetalkpic.twitter.com/6vxZBBbxV2
-
I didn't see that piece. I'd guess they don't consider it "science reporting" but you're right that's really not a good look for
@smh ping@liammannix
End of conversation
New conversation -
-
-
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.