My entire point is that there is no good way to delineate. I don't think you're ever going to have a silver bullet that isn't religious, because the real world is messy
-
-
This Tweet is unavailable.
-
Erring on the side of caution is all well and good when we're talking hypotheticals, but in real life with real people you've got to make a choice. Any option has pros and cons, that's the entire point of this discussion
0 replies 0 retweets 2 likes -
This Tweet is unavailable.
-
You are free to make whatever arguments you wish, but yes exactly there is no scientific basis that you can reasonably rely on to make those distinctions. It is your opinion, your moral compass, not fact
0 replies 0 retweets 2 likes -
This Tweet is unavailable.
-
"there is an undeniable, scientific case" If that was the argument you were trying to make, you made it poorly
0 replies 0 retweets 1 like -
This Tweet is unavailable.
-
Not at all. There are "deniable" cases for both arguments
0 replies 0 retweets 1 like -
This Tweet is unavailable.
This is just tedious semantics now. I'd suggest softening your language if you don't want people to assume that you're implying an undeniable truth in the future
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.